Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 12:17

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Apple’s latest AirPods Pro with USB-C just received a $70 discount - The Verge
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Samsung could drop Google Gemini in favor of Perplexity for Galaxy S26 - Ars Technica
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Which animal has the best sense of smell? - Live Science
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
The ‘inexcusable’ mistake Knicks made again and again in season-ending loss - New York Post
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Scientists visualize key protein structures linked to immune response and inflammation - Phys.org
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.